Showing posts with label Andre Villas-Boas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andre Villas-Boas. Show all posts

Monday, March 11, 2013

How to motivate pro footballers in Premier League when they don't give a shit

Last updated: 12 Mar. 2013
An Irish friend (@ChelsSince1970) quite rightly pointed out that the blog ignores the roles of managing men and leadership. See Addendum below.
This blog is a mini-rant on the notion that millionaire professional football players need a manager to motivate them. It derives from tweets about Chelsea FC's interim manager Rafa Benitez and how former manager José Mourinho, now at Real Madrid, would be so much better. 

In the past, when working at real jobs*, I never needed anyone to motivate me to do a good job  and protect patient safety, whether it was testing donated blood, 'crossmatching' donor and patient blood prior to transfusion, or teaching students the theory and practice of transfusion science and immunohematology.

*First as a medical laboratory technologist with Canada's national blood supplier (then Can. Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service, now Canadian Blood Services), and later as a clinical instructor and transfusion science instructor / professor in the Med Lab Science program at the University of Alberta.
When first starting out, I was paid poorly but eventually adequately, at least sufficiently for my needs. Money was not a motivator, supervisors could not motivate with criticism, praise, or promise of promotion

Whatever made me work hard, keep up-to-date, and try to excel came from within, was intrinsic. It was partly self-respect, partly because I wanted the respect of colleagues and students, and partly because errors in the jobs I had could directly lead to a person's death. The last is not that different than individuals who work as auto and airline mechanics, bus drivers, electricians, etc.

Which is why I'm amazed that apparently millionaire football players need to be motivated by managers to give their best. 


Excuse me? These young men earn mega-bucks, live a fantasy lifestyle with adoring fans, and are attractive to others even if they have ordinary looks. Reporters, service people in restaurants, young women in bars, you name it, fawn all over these guys. They have it made by any of society's standards of success.

Yet the poor dears need a manager to rouse them to greater efforts before and during games?

Of course, these young men, like all youth, have limited life experience. They may have overcome poverty, a disruptive home life, or not. Most are not well educated, at least not formally, as they went into football at a very young age. If lucky, they have supportive families who provide good financial and social advice.

MUSINGS ON MOTIVATION
What can motivate young men who have it all?

1. MONEY?
Harry Redknapp in a March 2012 article claimed it was only cash.

I'm skeptical about money as a motivator.

Average Premier League wages are ~ £22,353 a week before bonuses or £1.16 million/year (more than $1.7 million US). And top players earn much more, e.g., Lionel Messi 31million/yr (more than $40 million US).

To me the huge wages are almost FU money. These young dudes can pretty much do as they like, and do.

Only real outliers can wreck their careers with repetitive bad behavior, e.g.,  'Super Mario' Balotelli at Manchester City.

But even 'Super Mario', given his talent, has landed on his feet at AC Milan for another chance at glory.

2. FEAR?
On Twitter some Chelsea fans think fear of the manager can motivate, a reason to dream of 
José Mourinho's return. In games where CFC plays poorly they tweet that Jose wouldn't have put up with that mediocre performance.

What would he have done? Ranted and scared the bejesus out of the under-performing millionaires by the sheer strength of his personality?

Possible only if a manager has total control of the club. Can that be true for any Chelsea manager, given Roman Abramovich's hands-on approach, albeit via behind-the-scenes puppeteering, and his record of sacking managers

3. INSPIRATION?
Can 20-something millionaires be inspired by a manager's rhetoric? #Rafaout fans think that 
José is a genius who can inspire players to greater heights with sheer charisma and rhetoric. To me that may work for awestruck teenagers, not guys in their 20s with FU $$$$.

Also, it may work when players have grown up with a club and English football, where a club's history is heartfelt and ingrained into ones bone marrow at an early age.

Inspiring a largely foreign group of players is another matter. As Redknapp said, to them club history means nil. In Chelsea's current squad I count only 4 regular English starters.

4. BIG STICK OR CARROT?
In general, some people are motivated by threats ('big stick') and others by a promise of something desirable. 


What big stick do managers have? The most obvious stick is benching a player for poor play, threatening them with whatever the manager knows they fear.

But what's the carrot? Simply getting to start games or being a regular substitute?

Sooner or later players given the stick will opt to be transferred and sold to teams where they'll get to play regularly.

4. RECOGNITION and PRAISE?
Research on learning and employment show that people are most motivated by being respected and receiving praise for jobs well done.

What does that mean in the context of a professional football team? Examples:

  • Encourage players to express opinions and ideas and implement good ideas, whenever possible.
  • Never insult players individually and publicly for poor play. They know better then anyone else when they've screwed up or had a bad day. Instead use errors as teachable moments for the entire club.
  • Treat players fairly, no favorites. If the owner thinks otherwise, resign immediately as to play favorites makes you lose all credibility. 
  • Don't marginalize and exclude players who are off form. If anything, make them feel even more a part of the club, valuable contributors. 
  • Discuss an individual's poor play privately. Focus on what happened rather than pejorative characterizations, e.g., 'Your pass completion was 40% and you had no shots on net. Why do you think that happened?' (Not, 'You were totally sh*t today.') Then listen. 
  • Praise more than criticize but offer praise only when valid, else it becomes meaningless.
LEARNING POINTS

You may think that for professional footballers 'recognition and praise' advice is namby-pamby and spineless. But these strategies apply to all humans from live-in nannies to tenured university professors to millionaire pro footballers. We're all human beings with the same vulnerabilities and desires.

Think about your own job. What most motivates you to work harder? Money? Fear? Threats? Promises? Being respected and appreciated for a job well done? Depending on your individual circumstance, I bet for most it's being respected and appreciated.

As to rich, young pro footballers needing a manager to motivate them  to play better, my gut reaction is, 'Give me an effing break.'

So long as the manager isn't part of the problem by being abusive, player performance is mostly internally motivated as it was for me - self-respect and the respect of peers. 

Of course, managers exist for more than motivation. There's tactics and strategy, analysing the opposition, creating game plans. But this blog focuses only on the manager as motivator.

And I suspect that thinking a manager can motivate millionaire young players, especially foreign ones, is a crock. 
José would be no better than Rafa. Of course, Rafa was made a eunuch by 'interim manager' designation. 

If José - or any manager - had total control (unlikely at Chelsea), perhaps it would be possible. But mainly by using fear and threats, never the best approach. 'Do it for Chelsea' is a meaningless joke to most foreign players.

In today's Premier League, Harry Redknapp is likely correct about players:

  • They don't give a shit. [At least most of them...]
Addendum

José 
My Irish buddy Vera thinks I've misrepresented José Mourinho's management style. She notes that José is acknowledged as a great manager and leader of men, the type of guy who relates to and bonds with players such that he squeezes that extra bit out of them that wins championships. She supplied this  article on Mourinho and Lampard:
And she's right. Video clips of José in Chelsea's glory days of 2005-6 show that he came close to being accepted as 'one of the lads' while remaining his superior status as the gaffer. He was even a father figure to some, e.g., Michael Essien calls him daddy

This is a tough balancing act for any manager. Because familiarity breeds contempt, there must be a distance. Yet on some level staff need to see a manager as one of them, someone who knows and empathizes with their struggles.

Rafa
On the issue of José v Rafa as a leader of men, judging by achievements, it's José. Vera gives this example of how CFC players view Mourinho: 
Rafa may be a good manager. His record is not shabby. Certainly, his management style has its critics, including former players. That would be true of most managers in any profession.

But for Rafa, Chelsea was a non-starter from the start, as it would be for anyone who joined today's Chelsea: revolving door managers, even if you win the biggest club prize of all, the Champions League; Roman's circus of trained seals to front for his wishes.

AVB
When he managed Chelsea, André Villas-Boas had many skills needed in successful managers. But I thought he was a poor manager of men, that he lacked the necessary emotional intelligence to lead men. Time will tell with his career managing Tottenham Hotspurs.

BOTTOM LINE: The blog examines what motivates people and why millionaire footballers, in general, and Chelsea players, in particular, need motivating to play well. It was not meant to be about leadership and that was a serious omission. 

Perhaps José can provide the inspiration, recognition, and praise that motivates people to excel. However, being a cynic*, I'm not in the camp of those who think that José is Jesus and his second coming is imminent.

David Moyes is also a skilled manager of men. Chelsea hiring him would not be a bad thing.

Scratch any cynic and you will find a disappointed idealist. (George Carlin)

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Time for a Chelsea fan intervention? (We have met the enemy & he is us)

Updated 24 Feb. 2013

INTERVENTIONS
In health care an intervention is a process to help people with addictions like alcoholism, drug abuse, and eating disorders to change before things get even worse. Addicts are typically in denial or unwilling to seek treatment. An intervention by friends, family, and sometimes professionals, is designed to make them see the negative effects their destructive behavior has on themselves and others.

Addicts usually surround themselves with like-minded individuals who mirror themselves. Living in a bubble, they believe their own actions are acceptable. Anyone who challenges them is shunned and even attacked, similar to how dysfunctional families exclude family members who dare to voice never-mentioned realities.


This blog is written as food for thought. I could be wrong about just about everything below. That's okay. The ideas are only what I think, given my background and biases.

CHELSEA FC
Chelsea fans are also addicted, and not just to football and the team. Since 
the Russia plutocrat Roman Abramovich bought the team in 2003, they've become addicted to winning. Sadly, like many druggies, if they don't get their regular 'fix', they turn nasty. 

Background
Stamford Bridge - The loyalty of #CFC fans cannot be questioned. Chelsea's history shows that veteran fans lived through tough times in the 1970s and '80s and developed hope in the 1990s as the club gradually improved.  

When Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003, he poured mega-
£ into the club and his money achieved results. The club built an impressive record in the Premier League:
  • 2003-4: Runners-up
  • 2004-5: Champions
  • 2005-6: Champions
  • 2006-7:Runners-up
  • 2007-8:Runners-up
  • 2008-9: Third
  • 2009-10: Champions
  • 2010-11: Runners-up
  • 2011-12: Sixth 
Despite the disappointing 2012 PL finish, which would have dropped them from the all-important Champions League in 2012-13, in 2012 Chelsea won the biggest prize of all, the Champions League: 
Fans were blessed to watch a fabulous club win the PL and multiple trophies. Winning became a habit. Being a Chelsea fan allowed you to swagger and trash-talk other clubs and their fans such as London rivals Arsenal and other successful clubs like Manchester United and Liverpool.

For the past 9-10 years Chelsea fans have had it good. Glorious days to be fans and sing 'Blue is the Colour' (a truly crappy song) 
and 'We Know What We Are, Champions of Europe' (a truly arrogant chant). 

REALITIES
The 6th place Premier League finish in 2011-12 WAS and WAS NOT a harbinger of 2012-13. Chelsea is currently in 3rd place, with a chance for second. Not shabby by any means.

But they bombed out of the Champions League in the group stage, the first reigning champions to do so. This despite scoring more goals than any other team in the competition. Fact is in most years Chelsea played well enough to go through but not this year.

Playing in the Europa League (not Champions League) is seen as a disaster by Chelsea fans. Granted the CL has all the status, is worth mega-bucks in television revenue, and attracts big name players to the club. Yet many fine teams play in Europa League. It's hardly tragic, despite fan reaction.

I won't dwell on other league trophies as they're 'small potatoes' compared to CL. But Chelsea, reigning CL champions, still has chance to win FA Cup.

Chelsea has had 3 managers since June 2011 when Andre Villas-Boas was appointed. He was fired in March 2012. Then came Roberto di Matteo, a beloved Chelsea player, who led them to the CL title but was cruelly fired in November 2012.

Next, Roman hired the hated former Liverpool manager, Rafael Benitez, as interim Chelsea manager. As interim manager, Roman condemned Rafa to eunich status.

The instability of Chelsea managers is solely attributed to the Russian owner. Seems Roman is both a savior and a saboteur of club fortunes. So many managers in so short a time, 10 since he bought club in 2003, cannot be good policy in the long term, despite Chelsea's success to-date.

SO WHAT'S WITH CFC FANS?

To read Chelsea fans on Twitter, you'd think the club was in danger of relegation instead of being in 3rd place. Fans are cynical and critical. Many are downright hateful.

TORRES
Fernando Torres, transferred from Liverpool for 50 million pounds (not his fault) has not lived up to his Liverpool performance and is now a subject for widespread ridicule and hate among Chelsea fans. See my earlier blog (Jan 2013):

Other PL clubs have MULTIPLE talented strikers, one of whom usually scores, e.g., Van Persie, Rooney, Chicharito, Welbeck for MUFC; Tevez, Dzeko, Aguerro for MCFC. At Chelsea Torres carries the load and for this he's booed by his club's fans.

More than booed, some call Torres a piece of sh*t, a flop, a f*cking c*nt. That's the intellectual level and vocabulary of many Chelsea fans. 

No matter what Torres does, Chelsea fans focus on the transfer fee (not his doing), think he's overpaid and should be sold as fast as possible.

RAFA
Chelsea fan reaction to the current manager Rafa Benitez is a disgrace. As  Liverpool manager he alienated them but nothing  justifies such hostility.

RafaOut banners, booing him, calling him the Fat Spanish Waiter (FSW), chanting obscenities - all are the norm for Chelsea fans. They feel comfortable ridiculing a person for being fat, for being Spanish, and for being a waiter.

Are such fans great models for young Chelsea fans? Great models for tolerance? No. Chelsea fans don't realize that their behavior has far-reaching implications for what it promotes. For example, they'd be at home as bullies of chubby kids.

Chelsea fans now focus on who they don't like on the team (Rafa, Torres and Israeli Yossi Benayoun), interestingly, all former Liverpool employees.

CHELSEA HATE SYNDROME (CHS)
If you suffer from CHS, you point out Torres's mistakes more often than you applaud his good plays.

No matter what Torres does, you think he's overpaid and should be sold immediately.

No matter how many completed passes, assists or goals Torres makes, you only talk about him after he makes a bad play. He's the designated scapegoat for all Chelsea's failures. 


If the entire team plays poorly, it's Torres's fault.

Same for Rafa. You call all his tactics and substitutions shite, even if they turn out well. You ridicule everything he says and does. So far as you're concerned, he's the devil incarnate.

The beautiful game is supposed to be fun. How does constant complaining and criticizing every play make watching the game and being a fan more enjoyable?

Why does Torres's transfer fee and salary bother you so much? Sure, he's overpaid (as are most PL players), but it isn't his fault that Chelsea paid so much for him.

What he gets paid has nothing to do with how he plays. Put yourself in his position for a moment. Chelsea has been a nightmare for Torres, yet he shows up game in and game out, enduring the boos of his own club's fans. 


It's one thing to take abuse and ridicule on Twitter, where any idiot can tweet and does. Another to take it from print journalists, many of whom are envious wannabee jocks or over-the-hill ex-players. But live and in-person from your club's fans? To me that's over the line.

I'm reminded of a Humphrey Bogart quote on marriage: 

"I wonder if the f*cking you get is worth the f*cking you get." Clearly, for Torres, it's not.
No money can compensate for the constant abuse he takes.
INTERVENTION
I understand why Chelsea fans behave as they do. Winning is addictive. Soon you begin to think you're better than all the rest. It's exhilarating. You're special, others are sh*t.  You deserve to win, not just now, but forever, as illogical as that may be.

But booing a Chelsea player, ridiculing him - and spewing hatred across the twittersphere - is destructive with negative consequences for the entire team. Same with booing and ridiculing Chelsea's manager, Rafa. Totally non-productive. Accuse him of poor tactics and substitutions - fine. Fans have a right to their opinions no matter how correct or how ill-informed. But why call him a fat prick or fat c*nt? 


Is the sole purpose to make selfish fans feel better by abusing scapegoats? Could be. 


The worst cretins never fail to mention that the transfer fee for Torres was £50 million and love to report how few goals he has compared to others. Boring. We all know he isn't scoring enough but still they drone on with statistics.

Other fans get off on calling Torres names such as effing freckle-faced c*nt, useless twit, girly boy. And when he had longer hair, macho fans would get hot and bothered when he'd fuss with his hair band. Wow! That says more about the 'macho' fans than Torres.

Chelsea fan behavior is a microcosm of how prejudice works throughout the ages. Some individuals crave others to demonize so they can feel good about themselves. They have no milk of human kindness in their veins, little empathy. They're not reflective, thoughtful thinkers. Just haters who feel good when ridiculing others.

And the silence at Stamford Bridge in the last game, Chelsea v Sparta Prague, was truly disheartening. When down a goal or two, don't fans cheer loudly to spur their team on? Everywhere but Stamford Bridge it seems. 


Instead they boo a player when he's working his buns off, trying to score and overcome a 2 year+ nightmare.

Chelsea fans are addicted to winning, haven't a clue how to cope with anything less. Like all addicts, they're blind to the negative effects their destructive behavior has on themselves and others.

As Pogo discovered about the nature of mankind, 

Of course, doing poorly is relatively new and is exacerbated by the recent the glory days. Fans are only now adjusting to doing without their regular fix of winning trophies and the PL.

BOTTOM LINE
Will the Chelsea fans described here (not all, but many) ever assess their behavior as destructive, harming the club, undermining players and fellow fans? My guess is no. They're arrogant, certain they are right. How comforting that must be to them and their exclusionary clique of boo-birds. 


Wish they would wake up and smell the coffee. Realize how lucky they are. Enjoy the beautiful game. Know that success and failure come in cycles. Embrace kindness and empathy. See that we are all connected as humans, who have one wild and precious life (Mary Oliver poem, The Summer Day). 

Many losing clubs have long-suffering fans who cheer their players year in and year out. They always hope for better and, when some success occurs, it's cherished all the more. I suspect they're happier than many Chelsea fans.

FOR FUN
As for me, I consider Chelsea FC to be simply the best, better than all the rest. I support all the players and the manager du jour, whoever he may be.
I'd like to credit Jason Gregor for the idea for this blog: